NEW DELHI: India’s antitrust regulator has accused Amazon.com Inc of concealing information and making false submissions when it sought approval for a 2019 funding in a Future Group unit, a letter to the U.S. e-commerce big seen by Reuters confirmed.
The letter complicates Amazon’s bitter authorized battle with Future Group over the Indian’s agency’s choice to promote its retail property to Reliance Industries – a matter that’s now earlier than India’s Supreme Court docket.
Amazon has argued that phrases agreed upon in its 2019 deal to pay $192 million for a 49% stake in Future’s present voucher unit stop its mum or dad, Future Group, from promoting its Future Retail Ltd enterprise to Reliance.
Within the letter dated June 4, the Competitors Fee of India (CCI) mentioned Amazon hid factual features of the transaction by not revealing its strategic curiosity in Future Retail when it sought approval for the 2019 deal.
“The representations and conduct of Amazon earlier than the Fee quantities to misrepresentation, making false assertion and suppression or/and concealment of fabric information,” the letter mentioned. It additionally famous that its assessment of the submissions made had been prompted by a grievance from Future Group.
Within the four-page letter, a so-called ‘present trigger discover’, the CCI requested Amazon why it shouldn’t take motion and penalise the corporate for offering false info.
Amazon has but to reply, in accordance with a supply with direct information of the matter who declined to be recognized because the letter has not been made public.
Amazon mentioned in an announcement to Reuters it had obtained a letter, was dedicated to complying with India’s legal guidelines and would prolong its full cooperation to the CCI.
“We’re assured that we can handle the CCI’s considerations,” it mentioned.
Representatives for Future and the CCI didn’t reply to Reuters requests for remark.
Vaibhav Choukse, a contest regulation specialist and accomplice at J. Sagar Associates, mentioned it was uncommon for the CCI to problem such a discover and that if the CCI was not happy by Amazon’s response, it may result in a nice and even a assessment of the deal.
“The CCI has extensive powers which incorporates instructions to re-file the approval software and even revoke the approval below distinctive circumstances,” Choukse mentioned.
The CCI’s 2019 approval order states its choice “shall stand revoked if, at any time, the data offered” is discovered to be incorrect.
The dispute over Future Retail, which has greater than 1,500 grocery store and different retailers, is probably the most hostile flashpoint between Jeff Bezos’ Amazon and Reliance, run by India’s richest man Mukesh Ambani, as they attempt to achieve the higher hand in successful over the nation’s shoppers.
Amazon additionally has a number of different challenges in India, a key development market the place it has dedicated $6.5 billion in investments, together with a separate CCI probe into alleged practices that small companies say have harm them.
As well as, it faces the prospect of extra rules that will limit the sale of personal labels and would prohibit the U.S. agency from permitting its associates to checklist merchandise on its web site.
The CCI letter in contrast three units of submissions Amazon made to it in 2019 with submissions made later to different authorized boards, saying they had been “contradictory.”
Specifically, it mentioned Amazon had defined its curiosity in investing in Future’s coupon unit as one that will handle gaps in India’s funds trade. However the letter acknowledged Amazon had disclosed in different authorized boards that the muse of its relationship with Future Coupon was sure particular rights it obtained over Future Retail.
“Amazon has hid its strategic curiosity” in Future Retail, the letter mentioned, including: “Such curiosity and the aim of the mix … was not disclosed to the Fee regardless of particular necessities.”
The CCI additionally objected to 1 part of a submission the place Amazon had instructed the regulator it had nothing to do with one specific authorized settlement that two Future entities had signed between themselves days forward of its 2019 deal. However Amazon later claimed earlier than an arbitrator that the settlement was an “built-in half” of the transaction, the letter mentioned.